I am picking up where I left off yesterday with the exhibit at the Museum of History. This head carving in stone dates between 1275-1325, and is thought to show Eleanor of Castile, wife of Edward I. While Edward Longshanks gets a reputation in history as an ill tempered fellow, he was in fact devoted to his wife. Upon her death, he ordered crosses erected at each place where her funeral cortege rested on the road from Lincoln back to London. Stone heads like this were often found in religious architecture afterwards.
This tapestry, from right to left, was made in Alsace between 1440-1460, and depicts the seasonal work of peasants. It comes from the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum.
Seen here from two angles is a Tuscan chest, around 1400-1425. It's a local contribution to the exhibit, on loan from the National Gallery of Canada. It is gilded gesso on wood.
This plate is tin-glazed earthenware, dated back around 1450. It is decorated with a coat of arms that indicates it probably belonged to the household of Rene Valjois, Duc d'Anjou. His governing responsibilities during his lifetime included Naples, Piedmont, and Provence.
Medieval armour was found in this display case, including a sallet helmet, a bevor (neck guard), and aventail chainmail. They date to the 14th and 15th centuries.
This large tapestry was a bit difficult in terms of photographing. Dated circa 1475-1500, it is another work from the Victoria and Albert Museum. It depicts the Battle of Roncevaux, with Charlemagne's nephew Roland battling King Marsile in the midst of the 778 battle in the Pyrenees.
These are armour gauntlets, replicas in this case. Two staffers were close by if one wanted to try them. I just wanted the shot of them together.
This too is a contemporary reproduction of a suit of armour, belonging to the museum itself. I imagine it was likely assembled specifically for this exhibit.
...a part of history that I have little knowledge of.
ReplyDeleteHello William, thanks for this interesting post. The tapestry is beautiful but the armor is my favorite by far! Have a great day. Jo
ReplyDeleteVery interesting exhibit. A very shining suit of armour
ReplyDeleteWonderful post about this interesting exhibition.
ReplyDeleteHello, wonderful exhibit. I love the plate and the armour. Happy weekend to you!
ReplyDeleteI can't believe you didn't try one of the gauntlets William, I think it would have suited ☺ It's an impressive exhibition.
ReplyDeleteI really like today's selection, especially the mask and the plate. Amazing how these treasures get spread all over the world.
ReplyDeleteJanis
GDP
Can you imagine having to wear that heavy armor? Fascinating! :-)
ReplyDeleteAll the exhibits look so familiar to me...
ReplyDelete: )
I think I wouldn't be able to move inside a suit of armour! It must be terribly heavy and uncomfortable.
ReplyDeleteReally?? They let people try on those gauntlets? I'm amazed.
ReplyDeleteWE've always spent tome money and effort on fighting. Each age had it's technology. These are interesting examples of their defense.
ReplyDelete@Tom: my area of expertise is more recent.
ReplyDelete@Jo: you're welcome.
@Nancy: it's well put together.
@Jan: thanks!
@Eileen: thank you.
@Grace: I'll have to remedy that the next time I visit. I did try a gauntlet at the Armour exhibit over at the War Museum.
@Janis: there was a lot to see.
@DJan: it would slow anyone down.
@Catarina: not so much to me.
@Marleen: I would think so.
@Sharon: given that they're replicas done in the current day, yes. They wouldn't let anyone handle period artifacts in such a way.
@Red: true!
Fascinating history ~ great series of photos ~ everything comes back again in some fashion or other ~ ^_^
ReplyDeleteHappy Day to you,
A ShutterBug Explores
Very interesting. I find tapestries awesome. Almost a living picture show. Exciting and also bloody times but again when are they not?
ReplyDeleteAnd yes the pups got plenty treats
MB
Great exhibition, the tapestries are beautiful.
ReplyDeleteUma exposição com belas peças.
ReplyDeleteUm abraço e bom fim-de-semana.
Andarilhar
Dedais de Francisco e Idalisa
Livros-Autografados
I like the story about Edward's devotion to his wife and how he ordered crosses to be erected at each place where her funeral cortege rested on the road from Lincoln back to London - it is a tale that I did not know.
ReplyDeleteA fabulous display! Imagine walking in that armour!
ReplyDelete@Carol: true!
ReplyDelete@MB: good!
@Sami: I agree.
@Francisco: thanks!
@Rosemary: I've heard it before. The Eleanor Crosses, as they're called.
@RedPat: that would get tiresome!
A wonderful exhibit. I like the suit of armour, it's quite impressive.
ReplyDeleteI agree, about the suit of armour!
ReplyDeleteTapestries are amazing, all those stitches.
ReplyDeleteInteresting about the stone head.
ReplyDeleteI can't imagine wearing a suit of armor!!
This exhibition is quite impressive.
ReplyDeleteI think the tapestries are beautiful, but there is such a good selection of exhibits.
ReplyDeleteGood to see William, thank you.
All the best Jan
What an interesting walk back in time. The suit of armor seems very effective at providing protection but I can't imagine anyone being able to actually move and do anything in it. No sneak attacks with this getup.
ReplyDeleteThe 15th century tapestry is so beautiful. I've seen the remains of one or two Eleanor Crosses on my travels over the years:)
ReplyDeleteHow did they ever move in that armor?
ReplyDeleteAfter looking at those pierces of armor, I was wondering the same as a previous commenter - HOW did anyone manage to not only move in this gear, but also to ride a horse and carry a very heavy and large lance!
ReplyDeletelove armor, i wonder how folks wore that? i bet it was so heavy. always joke with the hubby that casket iron pots are so heavy, that it makes sense why women were so strong. way cool. ( ;
ReplyDeleteNice shot of gauntlets.
ReplyDeleteThose tapestries are exquisite, as is the Duc's plate. Lovely!
ReplyDelete@Bill: it is!
ReplyDelete@Jennifer: it's quite a work of art.
@Maywyn: that's true.
@Happyone: I couldn't!
@Michelle: it is indeed.
@Jan: you're welcome.
@Kay: definitely not.
@Rosie: I would like to see one.
@Norma: who knows?
@Beatrice: that's what I thought.
@Beth: much too heavy.
@Klara: I liked them.
@Jeanie: thanks!